Callaway Supersoft vs Titleist Velocity: Complete Comparison

Ball Construction and Design

The construction of each ball affects how it performs. The Titleist Velocity and Callaway Supersoft use different materials and designs to achieve their performance goals.

Core and Cover Differences

• The Velocity uses a NaZ+ ionomer cover and has a compression rating of 85
• The Supersoft features a hybrid cover with a lower compression of 60
• The Velocity is manufactured in the USA, while the Supersoft is made in Taiwan
• The Velocity has 350 round dimples, while the Supersoft uses 332 hexagonal dimples

The compression difference between these balls is significant. The Velocity sits at mid compression while the Supersoft targets players who prefer an ultra-soft feel. This compression gap creates distinct performance characteristics in both short game and full shots.

Feel and Sound Comparison

Feel remains a personal preference, but the difference between these balls is clear. The Supersoft lives up to its name around the greens.

Impact Feedback

• The Supersoft delivers an extremely soft feel on all shots
• The Velocity provides firmer feel with more audible feedback on putts and chips
• The Velocity gives a sense of the ball exploding off the face on full shots
• The Supersoft offers better feel for delicate shots around the green

Testing showed that the Velocity felt like it exploded off the face on drives and approach shots. The Supersoft provided a softer landing sensation. Neither ball felt harsh, but the contrast was clear. Players who want feedback will prefer the Velocity, while those seeking a pillowy feel will choose the Supersoft.

Distance and Ball Flight Performance

Distance matters to players with slower swing speeds. Both balls deliver good length, but testing revealed differences in how they get there.

Driver and Iron Distance

• The Velocity produced higher ball flight with both driver and irons in testing
• Trackman data showed the Velocity gained a few yards with the driver
• Both balls were consistent with seven iron distance
• The Velocity’s aerodynamics generate more spin on full shots

On-course testing confirmed the numbers. The Velocity flew straighter and landed in the fairway more often. On one hole, the Velocity cleared a bunker while the Supersoft came up short. The Velocity’s higher launch combined with better accuracy resulted in more usable distance. Both balls ranked among the longest in the market, making them solid choices for distance seekers.

Accuracy and Shot Shape

Distance means nothing if the ball ends up in the rough. The accuracy test measured which ball hit more fairways and greens.

Fairway Hit Percentage

• The Velocity landed in the center of fairways more consistently
• The Supersoft bounced into the rough on shots where Velocity stayed in play
• Both balls maintained similar lines on well-struck shots
• The Velocity never missed a fairway when the Supersoft found it

Three holes of testing showed clear results. The Velocity ended up in the fairway center on the first hole while the Supersoft barely caught the rough. On the second hole, both balls performed similarly, though the test showed a slightly fat contact affected the Velocity. The third hole saw both balls in the fairway. The Velocity’s straighter flight pattern gave it the edge in accuracy testing.

Spin and Control Around the Green

Short game performance separates good scores from great ones. Neither ball spins like a premium urethane ball, but differences exist between them.

Greenside Behavior

• The Velocity’s firmer cover provides better control on chips and pitches
• The Supersoft’s lower spin reduces bite on approach shots
• The Velocity offers better audible feedback with the putter
• The Supersoft landed on a green and rolled back a few feet on wet conditions

Testing revealed that the Supersoft’s soft feel did not translate to maximum control around greens. The lower spin design reduces workability on short shots. The Velocity’s firmer feel and better cover gave it an edge for control. The Velocity also performed better on the putting surface, where audible feedback helps most players judge strike quality. Players wanting premium ball spin should look elsewhere, but the Velocity offers more short game versatility than the Supersoft.

Launch Height and Trajectory

Higher launch helps players with slower swing speeds carry hazards and hold greens. Both balls aim to deliver high launch for their target audience.

Ball Flight Characteristics

• Both balls achieved high launch angles in testing
• The Supersoft flew slightly higher, though the difference was minimal
• The Velocity’s aerodynamics created more spin for approach shots
• Both balls suit players who need help getting the ball airborne

Testing across three holes showed similar launch angles. The Supersoft edged out the Velocity in peak height, but not by enough to notice during play. Both balls accomplished their design goal of helping players achieve high launch. The higher flight with added spin makes the Velocity better suited for approach shots into greens.

Color Options and Appearance

Visibility matters for ball tracking and recovery. Both manufacturers offer multiple colors beyond standard white.

Available Colors

• The Velocity comes in white, matte orange, green, and pink
• The Supersoft offers white, yellow, and matte red, orange, pink, and green
• The Velocity features double numbers on colored options
• The Supersoft’s side stamp uses a black bar with industrial text

The Supersoft wins for color variety with six options total. The Velocity offers four colors. Both balls use alignment aids, though the Velocity’s arrows and text differ from the Supersoft’s black bar design. Some players find the black bar more useful for alignment, while others prefer cleaner markings. The hexagonal dimples on the Supersoft can distract some players at address, while the Velocity’s round dimples offer a traditional look.

Price and Value Comparison

Both balls target budget-conscious players who still want performance. Price differences affect the value equation.

Cost Analysis

• The Velocity retails for $26.99 per dozen at major retailers
• The Supersoft costs $21.99 per dozen
• The Velocity costs about $5 more per dozen than the Supersoft
• Both balls offer substantial savings over premium balls like Pro V1

The Supersoft holds a clear price advantage. The $5 difference per dozen adds up over a season. Players who lose balls frequently will appreciate the Supersoft’s lower price point. The Velocity’s better performance in distance, accuracy, and control may justify the extra cost for some players. Both balls deliver excellent value compared to premium three-piece and urethane balls.

Best Player Profiles for Each Ball

No single ball works for every player. Understanding your game helps determine which ball fits better.

Titleist Velocity Suits These Players

• Players who prefer firmer feel and audible feedback
• Golfers who want maximum control around the greens
• Players seeking the straightest possible ball flight
• Those who prioritize distance with accuracy

The Velocity works best for players who hit reasonable fairway percentages and want a bit more greenside spin. The firmer feel appeals to players who dislike mushy impact. The better audible feedback helps on putts from longer distances. Players with swing speeds around 95 mph or less will get good results. The Velocity also suits players who plan to keep playing it as their game improves.

Callaway Supersoft Suits These Players

• Players who prioritize soft feel above all else
• Golfers with very slow swing speeds below 85 mph
• Budget-conscious players who want maximum value
• Those who already hit enough fairways and greens

The Supersoft targets players who want the softest possible feel without going to foam practice balls. The ultra-low compression works well for players with very slow swing speeds. The lower price makes it attractive for players who lose balls often. The soft feel around greens appeals to players who struggle with touch shots and need a forgiving ball. The Supersoft also works for players who hit plenty of greens in regulation and do not need extra spin.

Alternative Balls Worth Considering

Other balls in this price range offer similar performance. These alternatives deserve consideration based on your priorities.

Wilson Fifty Elite

• Two-piece construction with good greenside spin for a non-urethane ball
• Excellent value at the lowest price point in this category
• Good spin on approach shots compared to other ionomer balls
• Made in China, which some players avoid

Testing showed the Wilson Fifty Elite delivers surprisingly good greenside performance for its price. The ball spins better than expected on approach shots. Players who want maximum value and decent spin should test this ball. The severely underpriced Wilson Elite competes well with both the Velocity and Supersoft.

Three-Piece Alternatives

• The Maxfli Softfli offers three-piece construction at two dozen for $25
• The Vice Gamer Soft provides premium feel at value pricing
• The TaylorMade Project (a) delivers all-around performance for slightly more money
• These balls offer more spin than two-piece designs

Players willing to spend slightly more can move up to three-piece construction. The Maxfli Softfli and Vice Gamer Soft both deliver solid performance across all areas of the game. The TaylorMade Project (a) costs more but offers performance closer to premium balls. These three-piece options bridge the gap between budget two-piece balls and expensive tour balls.

Testing Methodology and Conditions

Valid comparisons require consistent testing methods. The testing for this comparison used professional equipment and real course conditions.

Testing Details

• Testing used Trackman launch monitor at SGGT studios for driver and seven iron data
• On-course testing included a par 3, par 4, and par 5 hole
• Testing measured distance, accuracy, launch height, and stopping power
• Temperature was 89 degrees during testing, affecting ball compression

The controlled indoor testing with Trackman provided accurate data for ball speed, launch angle, and spin rates. The on-course testing added real-world conditions including wind, varied lies, and pressure situations. Testing in warm conditions favored softer balls, as cold weather makes firm balls feel harder. The combination of indoor data and outdoor performance created a complete picture of each ball’s characteristics.

Durability and Longevity

Ball durability affects long-term value. Both balls use ionomer covers that resist cuts better than urethane.

Cover Durability

• The Velocity’s ionomer cover resists scuffs and cuts well
• The Supersoft’s hybrid cover provides good durability for multiple rounds
• Both balls last longer than premium urethane balls
• Neither ball shows excessive wear from normal use

Testing showed both balls held up well to normal wear. The ionomer and hybrid covers resist the scuffing that affects urethane balls. Players can expect to use each ball for multiple rounds before cosmetic damage becomes significant. The Velocity’s firmer cover may resist damage slightly better, but both balls offer good durability for their price point.